RKO Film Image
In the 1933 film “King Kong,” the beast died from causes other than biplanes’ strafing and the fall from the Empire State Building. The Vermont Yankee nuclear reactor’s demise, too, may be for reasons beyond the stated one.
The 1933 movie “King Kong” ends with a message that’s resonant when pondering what brought Entergy to decide to close the Vermont Yankee nuclear power reactor next year.
King Kong escapes from his captors and, clutching Ann Darrow, climbs to the top of New York’s Empire State Building. After being raked with bullets from delicate biplanes, the great ape plummets 1,450 odd feet to the street below. As a crowd gathers around the huge dead hulk, Kong’s captor, Denham, makes his way to the police barricade. The police officer says, “the airplanes got him.” The film ends with Denham’s famous reply, “Oh, no, it wasn’t the airplanes ... It was beauty killed the beast.”
Yes, it was economics that finally got Vermont Yankee — low wholesale electric prices, high production costs, etc. But as with King Kong, there’s a back story. The ultimate goal of a large corporation such as Entergy is to make money. Its growth or demise is about profit. The back story is what actually prevented Vermont Yankee from making enough profit to continue to operate for decades to come.
Certainly cheaper natural gas was a significant factor, as Vermont Yankee was an old plant that would require significant maintenance in the coming years. Pending costly federally mandated safety improvements, precipitated by the Fukushima disaster, also loomed.
The tipping point, however, the thing that might have really sealed Vermont Yankee’s fate, was grass-roots activism. In 2005 and 2006, when Act 74 and 160 were passed in the Vermont Legislature, both bills were enthusiastically supported by the entire legislative body, the Republican governor, Jim Douglas, and Entergy itself.
Act 74 provided Entergy with necessary spent-fuel onsite storage capabilities to continue operations. Act 160 gave the Legislature power over issuing a certificate of public good, state approval necessary for operation after 2012. In the Montpelier environment of seven or eight years ago it didn’t seem possible to Entergy and its supporters that these legislative acts would ever be a problem. But they did become a big, expensive problem.
Acts 74 and 160 became problems because the anti-nuke, environmental community in Vermont, southwestern New Hampshire, and western Massachusetts worked hard, long, and intelligently to rally public opinion, and educate the Vermont Legislature. Acts 74 and 160 became problems because Entergy underestimated the nature of Vermont’s uniquely accessible part-time citizen Legislature.
Entergy also never anticipated that in a narrow 2010 gubernatorial election victory a new governor would be propelled into office, to a significant extent by promising to close Yankee.
Entergy’s income was first impacted when, by late 2010 and early 2011, its reputation had become so damaged by its own misdeeds, brought to the spotlight by activists, that Vermont electric utilities played hardball in contract negotiations.
As a result, no deal emerged between Vermont Yankee and Vermont utilities, and Entergy was left to sell its product on the “spot” market, where prices had dropped because of cheaper natural gas.
Finally, while Entergy prevailed in its lawsuit against the state to pre-empt Acts 160 and 74 in federal court, that victory came at a high
cost, measured in its corporate life blood — money, as they spent millions of dollars in lobbying costs, legal fees, and publicity campaigns.
As with King Kong’s demise, economic bullets pierced Entergy’s flesh. But it was people power that raised the stakes and greatly increased the costs. The power of the people is beautiful. Oh, no, it wasn’t just economics. Beauty killed the beast.
Bob Bady is a resident of Brattleboro.MORE IN Perspective
Vermont’s child protection system is at a crisis point and legislators are working hard... Full Story
- Most Popular
- Most Emailed