TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Public discusses biomass at forum



Paul Markowitz, the head of the Vermont chapter of the Sierra Club, leads a biomass forum at the Statehouse on Wednesday evening.

KYLE MARTEL/TIMES ARGUS

Toolbox

By Thatcher Moats Times Argus Staff - Published: June 10, 2010

MONTPELIER – The sponsors of a public forum on biomass energy held in Montpelier on Wednesday said they believe wood from Vermont's forests should play a role in future electricity and heat production in the state.

But what's the best way to ensure an increase in biomass-fueled plants doesn't wreck those same forests and doesn't speed up climate change?

Striking that balance was the subject of a public forum at the Statehouse sponsored by several groups, including the Biomass Energy Resource Center, the Vermont Natural Resources Council and the Sierra Club.

The forum was a chance for organizers to hear what the public has to say about biomass energy.

It was one of three public forums – one was held in Middlebury last week and another is scheduled for White River Junction on July 8.



"These forums are listening sessions," said Jake Brown, spokesman for the Vermont Natural Resources Council. "We at VNRC and the other sponsors of the forums want to know what Vermonters of all perspectives think of this developing energy sector."

Brown said he hopes the information will help the state as it wrestles with how to promote and regulate the biomass industry, which may include developing harvesting guidelines, procurement standards and incentives. A Biomass Energy Development Working Group, created by the Legislature, is examining these issues and is expected to issue a final report next year.

The use of biomass to produce energy has been gaining steam in recent years.

There are large-scale power generators in Burlington and Ryegate. Forty-one schools in the state use wood-chip boiler systems. Colleges around Vermont also use biomass for heat.

A district energy system is proposed for the city of Montpelier that would connect the state offices, schools and municipal buildings to a renovated biomass plant at the site of the plant that heats the state office complex.

District energy projects also have been proposed in Randolph, Middlebury, Brattleboro and Burlington, according to the Biomass Energy Resource Center (BERC), which is based in Montpelier.

Seventy-eight percent of Vermont is covered in forest, according to a presentation by Andrea Colnes, a policy and development director with BERC, who spoke at the start of the forum.

And the Northeast in general has a lot of woodland, she said, so there are resources to fuel growth.

"We have a very viable wood supply – or wood basket – as our basis," she told the group of about 50 people who gathered for the forum.

The question, she said, is: Will we use the forest sustainably or in boom-and-bust cycles that lead to economic and ecological crashes? The question is not new, and has been under review for some time by various groups.

BERC, the Northern Forest Center, and the Carsey Institute at the University of New Hampshire, convened the Northern Forest Biomass Energy Initiative in 2006 and came up with a list of five principles to guide the use of biomass.

The principles that should guide biomass are sustainable forestry, maximized efficiency, local energy, energy security, and climate change mitigation, the group had determined.

Paul Markowitz, director of the Vermont chapter of the Sierra Club, and Colnes presented the outlines of biomass heating to the group, which then broke into smaller groups to examine the principles.

One group took up the issue of sustainability, and the session was more about exploring the principles rather than having an expert answer attendees' questions.

As the nation makes a transition from fossil fuel to biomass energy, "it seems almost inevitable that there's going to be huge pressure on forests," said Steve Crowley, of South Burlington, during the small-group session.

Crowley said the sustainability principle is important, but he wondered how you "define sustainable?"

David Frank, who works at a biomass business, SunWood Systems in Waitsfield, said he worried procurement standards that are too strict could hurt the industry.

"If we get too strict, we don't harvest anything basically," he said.

thatcher.moats@timesargus.com



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.





READER COMMENTS


Josh is spot on. Biomass is not, and will never be, a sustainable/viable source of energy in VT.

However, the article is a means to insert the name "Markowitz" into the TA liberal agenda. For all you sheep, try to remember this in Nov.

FYI, on any given day, the vast majority of wood for McNeil comes from NY by train. This does not begin to approach a sustainable approach to energy.
-- Posted by Jim Rice on Thu, Jun 10, 2010, 9:05 pm EST

report this comment



My last sentence was meant to say: "Anything else is a distraction."
-- Posted by Josh Schlossberg on Thu, Jun 10, 2010, 11:01 am EST

report this comment



There is no question we must wean ourselves off of fossil fuels, but we must make sure that our alternatives aren't just as bad or worse.

Burning forests for heating is not "green," but is already happening and probably always will, to a certain extent. But the use of forests for electricity is a dead end. We are already losing forest cover in the Northeast based on current uses of: 1. lumber 2. paper pulp 3. firewood. Now we want to add yet another insatiable demand to the list, a demand that consumes a 100 year old tree in minutes?

Our most effective buffer against climate change is our living forests. The second largest source of human caused carbon emissions is logging the world's forests, 25-30% of emissions according to the United Nations Food & Agriculture Organization. We are not going log ourselves out of this mess. To the contrary: the best climate measure we can take is to preserve forests.

The McNeil plant, a 50MW facility in Burlington burns roughly 500,000 green tons a year. Some (unofficial) estimates put this at around an acre of trees an hour.

Heating is essential to life and though it is far from the best use of a forest, I can understand the need. But incinerating trees within minutes to charge our i-things is a deplorable use of our invaluable and finite forests.

Further, according to the Department of Energy, biomass CO2 emissions exceed coal emissions by 50%, existing natural gas plant emissions by 150% and proposed natural gas plants by 330%. I am not suggesting we keep using fossil fuels--peak oil is for real--but I am suggesting that not all alternative energy sources are created equal.

The best bet, in my opinion, are zero-waste, zero-emissions renewable energy such as solar, wind, wave power, small hydro (no river dams), and ground source heat pumps. Also efficiency and conservation.

Of course what it comes down to in the end is no renewable energy source will power the American way of life. The most important thing we can do is to change our way of life to what the planet can sustain. Anything is a distraction.
-- Posted by Josh Schlossberg on Thu, Jun 10, 2010, 9:37 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout